![]() Qt by contrast seems a lot more accessible. Shoutout to Code, Tech, and Tutorials for making the best CMAKE tutorial by the way. I ended up running out of time before I could really dig into it. To its credit, it is a comprehensive document, but it required knowledge of how to compile and build C++ projects so I had to go and learn CMAKE before I could even helloWorld. The best help I could find online was a decade old tutorial. They’re often described as old, messy, and hard to work with. I tend to hear a lot of complaints about gnome projects especially. Maybe I’m misunderstanding, but isn’t that the whole point? Seems like a big miss if it can’t apply user-chosen desktop themes to the application. ![]() You made me look up what CSD means (Client-Side Decorations). Haha, that was great! I don’t know enough about programming to have strong opinions on these things myself, but I do know that most open-source developers love to complain about open-source projects and I love to hear it. SIMP FOR SYNFIG INKSCAPE AND BLENDER THEY ARE AWESOME! They are all tools and can become better and worse in the future I really think people should simp for none of these (qt gtk kde gnome xfce and etc) I personally hate both gnome and kde (that’s a anoder story for anoder day)Īnd I don’t want to sound like iam simping for qt I just think that it is better tool they recently did some spocky things about their lts version they are not perfect just better and also it isn’t like I hate gtk with a burning passion it’s a tool and as I said I really liked the way that synfig is using it and also iam running xfce (a gtk DE) Oh the developers! I came to opensource for democracy but these devs have a dictatorship running in there community the simply don’t care about you “they know what’s better for you” I have seen alot of issues in there gitlab but 99 percent of the time there answer is in this lines “I do not see a bug here but expected behavior” “it’s a not a bug but a feature” they just don’t care they are the worst most argent developers that I have ever seen in opensource community ![]() Gtk has a very small documentation than qt also qts documentation is better that’s all of it So I was around the gtk2 area but it seems that the move to gtk3 wasn’t at all backwards compatible The forth is its licenseing you need to make open source programs with gtk but in qt you can make closed source software too (I don’t think it’s really good but alot of developers like it idk) Gtk has glade and its a nice program but it all ends the there is nothing more (there is gnome builder but it is a mess)īut in qt you have a fully featured ide that you can code design and compile on also it has the visual studio feel in it and that’s grate for some one who is coming from vs I think you can say nautilus reached it’s end and is stuck in a cave under a forgotten islandįorth is the way of designing/programming for a dev ![]() Wanna just choose a file? NOPE I will run the hole nautilus BUT YOU CANT ENTER PATHS and some how we trimmed down nautilus even more I swear to God the javas file chooser is more functional even the fontforge home made widget set has a better file chooser I iam running a xfce desktop and aldough the desktop is based on gtk qt programs never look alian but with gtk programs especially the gnome ones they look just awful gtk only looks good when ran on gnome but qt is nice every were I don’t wanna start a civil war down hereįirst of all CSD it’s a war crime it mess up every thing it wastes alot of space (yes more than having a toolbar and a title bar) and it just brakes the look and feel of your desktop it’s just a useless and frustrating thing
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |